Community-Based Marketing-Dos and Don’ts
First a quick definition – Community-Based Marketing vs. Social Media.
Social Media to me sounds slippery. Like it’s a fad, phase or worse a “trend”. And in some ways it is. It suddenly became the darling of the “Web 2.0″ world and everyone was an expert that had ever written on a blog. But for those of use in this industry (Interactive Marketing, Web Design, Development) when the term first came bubbling up into the common knowledge realm it was like putting a name to things we had been doing for awhile. It was one of those “Aha” moments, not unlike when the term Web Master finally came into business lexicon and people knew what it meant. A lot of us were going “so that’s what I do”!
But I live and work (and love) Texas. It’s not that we are more conservative, it’s that – ok we are more conservative than the coasts. Many of our clients are lawyers, law firms or corporations. But we aren’t stupid. When something makes sense, we do it! Especially if it means something for our businesses. So take Social Media which is about at it’s core connecting with your customers. It’s community and interaction. It’s being connected with people you work with, sell to and interact with through your company. None of those things are foreign to us Texans. With that thought in mind, I reframed Social Media into what it truly is Community-Based marketing. Same idea, different name.
Dos and Don’ts in Community-Based Marketing
The biggest “fear” about community-based marketing when talking to my clients is this – “what if my clients/people talk back to me.” And it’s not that they are afraid to connect with their customers, it’s that they are afraid that it will just be an open door of rants and negativity. The stories of “trolls” and people just being ugly have filtered back to them. And yes, it’s true that once you open the door to allowing clients to interact with you, there might be some people that are not happy with the company, or a decision you made or even a connection that happened in the past. This is a real and valid fear. But it’s worth getting over those fears and really being in tune with what’s right and what’s wrong in the marketplace. Companies pay lots of real dollars to get “marketing research” about what’s going on in their industries. With community-based marketing, it’s all right there. You just have to listen, know where to look and not take it personally. We as people all make mistakes and since we run companies, mistakes happen. People aren’t always out there to crucify you and your company. They just (many times) want to be heard, know that their feedback matters and that you acknowledge you are listening.
For me and what I tell my clients here is the list of dos and don’ts:
- Do open that door and let clients interact with you. Allow comments, join forums, create a space for communication to happen
- Don’t overreact when someone comments in a negative or unintended way
- Do acknowledge their frustration, anger, issue either publicly or directly if appropriate
- Do attempt to make their feedback matter – it doesn’t always have to be a grand gesture. Giving a future discount, connecting them to the appropriate internal people to rectify, acknowledging a decision had unintentional consequences, allowing them to vent, etc.
- Don’t be surprised when people are positive. Many times our fears, are just that, fears. You do good work or you wouldn’t be in business. Allow people to respond to you positively.
- Do get a thick skin. Just like ever arrow slung your way doesn’t need to hit it’s target, every compliment doesn’t need to get you an award.
- Do listen to the trends. The door to your customers is open for a reason. If you hear lots of times, that something isn’t working, change it. If you hear that their is something clients want, give it to them. This is good stuff, and ignoring it is a bad decision.
- Don’t get bullied. This might seem counter to everything I’ve said above but you are allowed to set boundaries about how you will and won’t be treated, even online. If I feel someone is a troll, I block them or report them. And I define Troll as someone who just causes havoc to cause havoc. I am open for discussion and opinions, I am not open to people being jerks because they are hiding behind a computer screen.
And here is the most important DON’T.
- Don’t sue someone over a Tweet. I can see if this was Robert Scoble or Mark Davidson who have thousands and thousands of followers. But this woman has 26 (before she cancelled her account) followers. She expressed an opinion to a few of her friends. You sue her for $50,000 and now everyone in the Interactive World and beyond knows who you are, that their might be mold in one of your apartments and you are a company that will whip out their legal department over NOTHING!
If community-based marketing is about interaction and connection with your clients and potential-clients, then jump in. The waters warm, the people are generally nice and the rewards are genuine.
I would love to hear from you – if you are a business what your experience has been or if you are still the fear area, what is your fear. Interactive marketing people – do you have any other do’s or don’ts? And of course, any other feedback is welcome as well.



Ben Foster says:
July 29, 2009 at 10:22 am
Tina – Here are some additions to the great discussion you kicked off:
DO plan on spending a lot of time to see rewards
DO expect some frustration before getting it right
DO outline the metrics and use them to tell a story
DO understand that it is absolutely impossible to make everyone happy
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.
Tina Winslow Hudson says:
July 29, 2009 at 10:46 am
Ben – Those are excellent additions. I especially like the metrics suggestion because closing the loop in terms of knowing what works is vital! Thanks for joining the conversation and I look forward to more!
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.
Keith Echo says:
July 29, 2009 at 2:23 pm
Tina,
What about saturation? In a social network, at what point to you not push to clients/friends/both? How do you know?
Keith
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.
Tina Winslow Hudson says:
July 29, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Keith – That’s a good point and one I worry about as I have combined my streams. Most of my friends are in the industry and know that I can get a little intense but I definitely don’t want to invade their space when they intend for it to personal. If you extrapolate this out, having two spaces one business and one personal is an option. In terms of pushing too much to clients or others, giving an opt out is key and being respectful of how much information you push out.
What do you think? You are on the other side of social media – what do you think about saturation?
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.
Keith Echo says:
July 30, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Tina – Short answer on a social network, saturation is annoying even if I am the proponent. A great topic, it is an interesting reflection of our humanness and one to watch. The two-spaces option is a rational model of an organic process. As humans we tend to catalogue things and define their relationship (at the base) along a single partition, before and after, we poke and interact with them. As a “consumer” of social media, I think you have to keep your hand on the tiller, predict and interact, not react. The waters are much less predictable than metrics may be able to tell you. Metrics assumes you have a base for comparison. The protocols of new channels take time to evolve and you don’t want to oppress their potential by forcing them to react to over-stimulation. I guess I define saturation as over exposing your product or service in the market; like say, Kleenex, a brand that is so embedded in the language that any brand of tissue hits its target. You want clients/friends/both to seek you out for your specialty, but you don’t want them to opt out, because you answer their question over and over.
In a profession network, the protocols are well defined along common interests, answer before asked; but in the broadest sense of a social network, protocols are fluid. For example, Facebook’s intent was a professional/personal social network, but the professional side dims more and more with its popularity to the extent where mining professional information is a subversive affront to privacy. A professional network expects its data to be mined for mutual benefit. An interesting case to watch is Twitter users on Caltrain, http://cow.org/c/about. Users post information about specifics as they ride along in real time; users Tweet about which cars are clean, which are quiet, delays, which bathrooms work, even satiric comments from frustration are expressed. So far, Caltrain reads the Tweets, but does not directly participate in the network. Instead, they clean cars, fix bathrooms, etcetera, interacting without reacting. Caltrain can mine specific data about conditions in their service without ever asking directly or accepting responsibility for the question. They can solve real time nuts/bolts maintenance without negative media connotations, and avoid saturating the market with information/reactions about those issues of their brand.
As the two-space model expands and retracts, I guess the trick is to find specific intersections, use them in real time let them go, find the next intersection, and repeat. The market is the potential intersections. Hum, saturation must occur when the networks intersect, define the market as those intersections, and then assume the intersection is the only market.
However, I don’t mean to saturate you on this topic.
[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ’0 which is not a hashcash value.