<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging the Website, End Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/2009/08/judging-the-website-end-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/2009/08/judging-the-website-end-product/</link>
	<description>Web Strategist at Heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:49:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What End Result Do You Want?</title>
		<link>http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/2009/08/judging-the-website-end-product/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>What End Result Do You Want?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/?p=93#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twit, Tweet, Twitter - A Rant in Three Parts &#124; Tina Winslow Hudson</title>
		<link>http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/2009/08/judging-the-website-end-product/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Twit, Tweet, Twitter - A Rant in Three Parts &#124; Tina Winslow Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/?p=93#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...]  In relation to my previous post, I was thinking I had a string going.   Blog about how to judge the web business, how failure is important in this process and I have a whole series on counter intuitive web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  In relation to my previous post, I was thinking I had a string going.   Blog about how to judge the web business, how failure is important in this process and I have a whole series on counter intuitive web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/2009/08/judging-the-website-end-product/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinawinslowhudson.com/?p=93#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Another point to consider is the client&#039;s wishes. As service providers, we propose ideas and suggestions to the client, but since they pay the bills theirs is the final say. Thus, sometimes we end up producing a website that may not have exactly the design we want, or a diminished feature set we&#039;d rather enhance, but the client insisted on having it that way. This can be a real challenge for a portfolio.

We had a client that wanted their website recoded to be more search engine friendly. I didn&#039;t much care for the design and layout they had, yet they insisted that we keep that same design/layout. So, once we finished, we decided not to include that site in our portfolio because we didn&#039;t want folks to get the wrong idea about our capabilities.

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;0 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point to consider is the client&#8217;s wishes. As service providers, we propose ideas and suggestions to the client, but since they pay the bills theirs is the final say. Thus, sometimes we end up producing a website that may not have exactly the design we want, or a diminished feature set we&#8217;d rather enhance, but the client insisted on having it that way. This can be a real challenge for a portfolio.</p>
<p>We had a client that wanted their website recoded to be more search engine friendly. I didn&#8217;t much care for the design and layout they had, yet they insisted that we keep that same design/layout. So, once we finished, we decided not to include that site in our portfolio because we didn&#8217;t want folks to get the wrong idea about our capabilities.</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8216;0 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
